Kant's "Aesthetic Idea": Towards an Aesthetics of Non-Attention

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Standard

Kant's "Aesthetic Idea" : Towards an Aesthetics of Non-Attention . / Tygstrup, Frederik.

In: Nordic Journal of Aesthetics, Vol. 32, No. 65, 2023, p. 144-153.

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Harvard

Tygstrup, F 2023, 'Kant's "Aesthetic Idea": Towards an Aesthetics of Non-Attention ', Nordic Journal of Aesthetics, vol. 32, no. 65, pp. 144-153. https://doi.org/10.7146/nja.v32i65-66.140115

APA

Tygstrup, F. (2023). Kant's "Aesthetic Idea": Towards an Aesthetics of Non-Attention . Nordic Journal of Aesthetics, 32(65), 144-153. https://doi.org/10.7146/nja.v32i65-66.140115

Vancouver

Tygstrup F. Kant's "Aesthetic Idea": Towards an Aesthetics of Non-Attention . Nordic Journal of Aesthetics. 2023;32(65):144-153. https://doi.org/10.7146/nja.v32i65-66.140115

Author

Tygstrup, Frederik. / Kant's "Aesthetic Idea" : Towards an Aesthetics of Non-Attention . In: Nordic Journal of Aesthetics. 2023 ; Vol. 32, No. 65. pp. 144-153.

Bibtex

@article{563ce0e2441e4b1db46400eab6c3c4bc,
title = "Kant's {"}Aesthetic Idea{"}: Towards an Aesthetics of Non-Attention ",
abstract = "In Critique of Judgment, Kant introduces a foundational theme in modern aesthetics by identifying the judgment of taste as a particular mode of attention. In distinction to the mode of attention in mundane experience that works by determining how an intuition can be subsumed under a concept, aesthetic attention celebrates the pleasure associated with the “unison in the play of the powers of the mind” confronted with “the manifold in a thing.” Aesthetic attention, in other words, is an aesthetic subject{\textquoteright}s attention to itself and to the pleasures derived from flexing the power of imagination. In this respect, Kant{\textquoteright}s aesthetics reaffirms its cartesian core, the primordial positing of the thinking and reflective I as the necessary preposition for experience. This strict distribution of attention toward the secure epistemological architecture of object and subject seems to vacillate, however, in Kant{\textquoteright}s brief discussion of artworks as purveyors of “aesthetic ideas.” This article discusses the de-limitation of attention instigated by the aesthetic idea. The aesthetic idea is associated with the artwork as an object, but it immediately transgresses the limits of the object through an array of analogical instantiations of “spirit.” On the other hand, aesthetic ideas are subjectively appreciated, but this appreciation similarly transgresses subjective cognition in an inexhaustible ramification of associative thinking. Developing these characteristics of the “aesthetic idea,” the article proposes to excavate from Critique of Judgment a mode of aesthetic sensibility that eventually challenges the Cartesian architecture of subject and object and thus reposits aesthetics in a field of relational interdependency.",
author = "Frederik Tygstrup",
year = "2023",
doi = "10.7146/nja.v32i65-66.140115",
language = "English",
volume = "32",
pages = "144--153",
journal = "Nordic Journal of Aesthetics",
issn = "2000-1452",
publisher = "Nordiska Saellskapet foer Estetik",
number = "65",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Kant's "Aesthetic Idea"

T2 - Towards an Aesthetics of Non-Attention

AU - Tygstrup, Frederik

PY - 2023

Y1 - 2023

N2 - In Critique of Judgment, Kant introduces a foundational theme in modern aesthetics by identifying the judgment of taste as a particular mode of attention. In distinction to the mode of attention in mundane experience that works by determining how an intuition can be subsumed under a concept, aesthetic attention celebrates the pleasure associated with the “unison in the play of the powers of the mind” confronted with “the manifold in a thing.” Aesthetic attention, in other words, is an aesthetic subject’s attention to itself and to the pleasures derived from flexing the power of imagination. In this respect, Kant’s aesthetics reaffirms its cartesian core, the primordial positing of the thinking and reflective I as the necessary preposition for experience. This strict distribution of attention toward the secure epistemological architecture of object and subject seems to vacillate, however, in Kant’s brief discussion of artworks as purveyors of “aesthetic ideas.” This article discusses the de-limitation of attention instigated by the aesthetic idea. The aesthetic idea is associated with the artwork as an object, but it immediately transgresses the limits of the object through an array of analogical instantiations of “spirit.” On the other hand, aesthetic ideas are subjectively appreciated, but this appreciation similarly transgresses subjective cognition in an inexhaustible ramification of associative thinking. Developing these characteristics of the “aesthetic idea,” the article proposes to excavate from Critique of Judgment a mode of aesthetic sensibility that eventually challenges the Cartesian architecture of subject and object and thus reposits aesthetics in a field of relational interdependency.

AB - In Critique of Judgment, Kant introduces a foundational theme in modern aesthetics by identifying the judgment of taste as a particular mode of attention. In distinction to the mode of attention in mundane experience that works by determining how an intuition can be subsumed under a concept, aesthetic attention celebrates the pleasure associated with the “unison in the play of the powers of the mind” confronted with “the manifold in a thing.” Aesthetic attention, in other words, is an aesthetic subject’s attention to itself and to the pleasures derived from flexing the power of imagination. In this respect, Kant’s aesthetics reaffirms its cartesian core, the primordial positing of the thinking and reflective I as the necessary preposition for experience. This strict distribution of attention toward the secure epistemological architecture of object and subject seems to vacillate, however, in Kant’s brief discussion of artworks as purveyors of “aesthetic ideas.” This article discusses the de-limitation of attention instigated by the aesthetic idea. The aesthetic idea is associated with the artwork as an object, but it immediately transgresses the limits of the object through an array of analogical instantiations of “spirit.” On the other hand, aesthetic ideas are subjectively appreciated, but this appreciation similarly transgresses subjective cognition in an inexhaustible ramification of associative thinking. Developing these characteristics of the “aesthetic idea,” the article proposes to excavate from Critique of Judgment a mode of aesthetic sensibility that eventually challenges the Cartesian architecture of subject and object and thus reposits aesthetics in a field of relational interdependency.

U2 - 10.7146/nja.v32i65-66.140115

DO - 10.7146/nja.v32i65-66.140115

M3 - Journal article

VL - 32

SP - 144

EP - 153

JO - Nordic Journal of Aesthetics

JF - Nordic Journal of Aesthetics

SN - 2000-1452

IS - 65

ER -

ID: 325020347