Cultural policy in the age of algorithmic platform societies

Research output: Contribution to conferenceConference abstract for conferenceResearchpeer-review

Standard

Cultural policy in the age of algorithmic platform societies. / Valtýsson, Bjarki.

2019. Abstract from NCCPR - The Nordic Conference for Cultural Policy Research 2019, Bifrøst, Iceland.

Research output: Contribution to conferenceConference abstract for conferenceResearchpeer-review

Harvard

Valtýsson, B 2019, 'Cultural policy in the age of algorithmic platform societies', NCCPR - The Nordic Conference for Cultural Policy Research 2019, Bifrøst, Iceland, 29/08/2019 - 30/08/2019.

APA

Valtýsson, B. (2019). Cultural policy in the age of algorithmic platform societies. Abstract from NCCPR - The Nordic Conference for Cultural Policy Research 2019, Bifrøst, Iceland.

Vancouver

Valtýsson B. Cultural policy in the age of algorithmic platform societies. 2019. Abstract from NCCPR - The Nordic Conference for Cultural Policy Research 2019, Bifrøst, Iceland.

Author

Valtýsson, Bjarki. / Cultural policy in the age of algorithmic platform societies. Abstract from NCCPR - The Nordic Conference for Cultural Policy Research 2019, Bifrøst, Iceland.

Bibtex

@conference{93427fcc831a46cdad7ea5025ecd5a64,
title = "Cultural policy in the age of algorithmic platform societies",
abstract = "Algorithmic platform societies are societies where large tech companies are instrumental in determining cultural representation, cultural distribution and cultural consumption. In the West, Apple, Amazon, Microsoft, Facebook and Google are referred to as the {\textquoteright}big five{\textquoteright}, and together they exceed huge power in determining modern cultural representation. These companies are influential as social network sites, search engines, web browsers, advertising service programs, video-sharing services, geospatial information system services, cloud platforms, software, hardware, app stores, pay services, and thereby to large degree control the infrastructural backbone of digital cultural production and cultural consumption (Bratton 2015; Pasquale 2015; Zuboff 2015; Gillespie 2018; van Dijck et al. 2018). Furthermore, the geopolitics of these services are formed in constant reciprocal relations between the local, the national, the supranational and the global. Therefore, the peripheries of the cultural field have changed dramatically in the span of relatively short time.This paper aims to theoretically discuss some of the consequences of these changes from the view point of (digital) cultural policy. This will be done by accounting for the macro sphere of tech giants, algorithmic cultures, platform societies and big data, and how these relate to the traditional normative assumptions inherent in cultural policy. On a meso level, the paper will discuss how established ac tors and institutions within national cultural fields are increasingly dependent on using these services, particularly in realizing the promise of cultural participation. Finally, the paper will treat this from the micro level of {\textquoteright}user politics{\textquoteright}, and citizens{\textquoteright} rights as data subjects.",
author = "Bjarki Valt{\'y}sson",
year = "2019",
language = "English",
note = "null ; Conference date: 29-08-2019 Through 30-08-2019",

}

RIS

TY - ABST

T1 - Cultural policy in the age of algorithmic platform societies

AU - Valtýsson, Bjarki

PY - 2019

Y1 - 2019

N2 - Algorithmic platform societies are societies where large tech companies are instrumental in determining cultural representation, cultural distribution and cultural consumption. In the West, Apple, Amazon, Microsoft, Facebook and Google are referred to as the ’big five’, and together they exceed huge power in determining modern cultural representation. These companies are influential as social network sites, search engines, web browsers, advertising service programs, video-sharing services, geospatial information system services, cloud platforms, software, hardware, app stores, pay services, and thereby to large degree control the infrastructural backbone of digital cultural production and cultural consumption (Bratton 2015; Pasquale 2015; Zuboff 2015; Gillespie 2018; van Dijck et al. 2018). Furthermore, the geopolitics of these services are formed in constant reciprocal relations between the local, the national, the supranational and the global. Therefore, the peripheries of the cultural field have changed dramatically in the span of relatively short time.This paper aims to theoretically discuss some of the consequences of these changes from the view point of (digital) cultural policy. This will be done by accounting for the macro sphere of tech giants, algorithmic cultures, platform societies and big data, and how these relate to the traditional normative assumptions inherent in cultural policy. On a meso level, the paper will discuss how established ac tors and institutions within national cultural fields are increasingly dependent on using these services, particularly in realizing the promise of cultural participation. Finally, the paper will treat this from the micro level of ’user politics’, and citizens’ rights as data subjects.

AB - Algorithmic platform societies are societies where large tech companies are instrumental in determining cultural representation, cultural distribution and cultural consumption. In the West, Apple, Amazon, Microsoft, Facebook and Google are referred to as the ’big five’, and together they exceed huge power in determining modern cultural representation. These companies are influential as social network sites, search engines, web browsers, advertising service programs, video-sharing services, geospatial information system services, cloud platforms, software, hardware, app stores, pay services, and thereby to large degree control the infrastructural backbone of digital cultural production and cultural consumption (Bratton 2015; Pasquale 2015; Zuboff 2015; Gillespie 2018; van Dijck et al. 2018). Furthermore, the geopolitics of these services are formed in constant reciprocal relations between the local, the national, the supranational and the global. Therefore, the peripheries of the cultural field have changed dramatically in the span of relatively short time.This paper aims to theoretically discuss some of the consequences of these changes from the view point of (digital) cultural policy. This will be done by accounting for the macro sphere of tech giants, algorithmic cultures, platform societies and big data, and how these relate to the traditional normative assumptions inherent in cultural policy. On a meso level, the paper will discuss how established ac tors and institutions within national cultural fields are increasingly dependent on using these services, particularly in realizing the promise of cultural participation. Finally, the paper will treat this from the micro level of ’user politics’, and citizens’ rights as data subjects.

M3 - Conference abstract for conference

Y2 - 29 August 2019 through 30 August 2019

ER -

ID: 229105413